In a world obsessed with wellness trends and protein food, one recent clinical trial made headlines by claiming that a switch to a “African heritage diet” could reverse inflammation and metabolic dysfunction within weeks. The study, published in Nature, is applauded for its use of multiomics — but beneath the buzzwords lies a study worth closer inspection.

Let’s take a closer look at the study. While there are many strengths, we’ll focus on the key flaws and what happens when diet science gets it wrong in the real world.

I help health orgs and researchers communicate insights clearly — reach out if you want to collaborate!

Summary of study

This study looks at how different diets and fermented beverages can affect our immune system and metabolism. The researchers focused on comparing the Western Diet and the Ancestral Health Diet, along with a fermented drink, by analyzing various biomarkers using advanced techniques like proteomics and metabolomics. Participants followed these diets in a crossover design, meaning they tried both diets and the fermented beverage at different points, serving as their own control. The results suggest that the Ancestral Health Diet might help reduce inflammation and improve metabolism, while the fermented beverage seems to offer some short-term immune benefits. However, the study highlights that more research with larger and more diverse groups of people is needed to fully understand these effects.

🧪 What the Study Got Right — and Wrong

📌 Research Question: Strong Intent, But Limited Scope

The Research Question: Great Intent, Narrow Execution

The study asked a meaningful question: Can diet shift your immune and metabolic health?
To test it, researchers used a crossover design — each participant switched between a Western diet, a heritage (Ancestral Health) diet, and a fermented beverage phase.

Sounds good, right? Sort of.
It wasn’t a full-blown randomized controlled trial (RCT), and blinding was missing. Plus, the trial only ran for four weeks per diet, with a small, homogenous group (hello, healthy young dudes 👋). So yeah… not exactly the gold standard.

Open-Label Flaws & Carryover Chaos

Using a crossover model means each person serves as their own control — great for reducing individual variation. But when there’s no blinding, and no biological proof that participants actually followed the diet? That’s a problem.

✅ Our take: Give us a longer trial, a mix of ages and genders, and maybe throw in a few folks with actual metabolic issues.

✅ Suggestion: A longer, more diverse study (with females, older adults, people with chronic illness) would better assess long-term and population-wide implications.

✅ Suggestion: Adding a longer washout period and using objective dietary adherence measures (e.g., metabolomics-based food intake biomarkers) could improve reliability.

🔬 Multiomics: The Heart of the Trial

Here’s where things got cool:
Switching from the heritage diet to the Western diet explained:

📊 Heritage Diet Effects

🔻 Reduced inflammation markers
🧬 Improved immune gene expression
💥 ↓ IL-6, CXCLs, CASP8 — linked to chronic inflammation
⏱️ Rapid molecular shifts in just 4 weeks
🧠 Sustained impact even after switching diets

🍔 Western Diet Effects

⚠️ ↑ Pro-inflammatory proteins (TWEAK, THBS4, ANGPTL3)
🔥 ↑ CRP — classic marker of inflammation
🧪 ↓ Cytokine production — possible immune imbalance
📉 Reversed many benefits seen on the heritage diet

🥤 Fermented Beverage Phase

⚡ Short-term spike in cardiometabolic proteins
💧 ↓ CCL5, IL-17A later on — possible immune modulation
⏳ Fast effects, but unclear long-term impact

🧪 Multiomics Explained the Variance

🧬 41.3% — Plasma metabolites
💉 25.9% — Plasma proteins
🔥 40% — Cytokine production
🧠 19.1% — Whole-blood gene expression

🛑 No clinical outcomes measured (e.g., insulin, blood pressure)
📌 Biomarkers ≠ guaranteed health outcomes

And the opposite shift (Western → Heritage)? Even more dramatic effects in key health pathways. So yes, diet clearly does something.

But — and this is a big but — there were no actual health outcomes measured. No blood pressure data. No insulin sensitivity changes. Just biomarker movement.

✅ Let’s not confuse molecular changes with clinical outcomes. They’re not the same thing.

These shifts weren’t just statistical artifacts — they suggest real biological adaptation, especially the sustained inflammatory and metabolic benefits of the heritage diet and harmful consequences of Western diets.

It’s clear that food can flip molecular switches fast. But how long these changes last — and whether they matter in the real world — is still up in the air.

📌 Interpretation Leaps

The authors imply that short-term shifts in cytokines and plasma proteins have long-term health consequences — but that’s speculative. No clinical endpoints were measured (e.g., blood pressure, insulin sensitivity, gut microbiome diversity).

✅ Suggestion: Clearly distinguish mechanistic insights from clinical implications to avoid misleading readers or policymakers.

⚠️ Bias Alert: Who’s in the Study?

Young. Fit. Male. And That’s It.

This was basically a study of gym-going guys with decent health to start with. That means the results can’t be generalized to the broader population — especially women, older adults, or people with chronic disease.

There’s also a clear pro-heritage-diet narrative throughout the write-up. Enthusiasm is fine, but let the data speak louder than the authors’ opinions.

✅ Next time? Broaden the sample. Dial down the hype.

📣 Implications for Public Health

If taken out of context, this study could mislead:

• Public readers may falsely believe short-term dietary shifts are enough to reverse chronic inflammation.
• Policy stakeholders might overstate the evidence for heritage diets without long-term outcome data.
• Clinicians could be left without practical guidance on how to implement these findings.

🤔 So, What Does This Mean for You?

💡 Yes, food really can change your body — fast.
In just 4 weeks, switching to a traditional, whole-food-based diet (like the African heritage diet) changed people’s inflammation and metabolism at the molecular level.

🌿 The Good News

✅ Eating more natural, plant-based, unprocessed foods can calm inflammation — a root cause of many diseases.
✅ Even short-term changes showed effects — that’s encouraging for people starting their health journey.

⚠️ But… It’s Not a Magic Bullet

🚫 The study didn’t track real-world health outcomes like blood pressure, weight loss, or long-term disease prevention.
🚫 It only tested young, healthy men — so we don’t know how this would work for older adults, women, or people with chronic illness.

🧠 Final Word

This is an important trial — beautifully analyzed, but methodologically limited. The multiomics data adds valuable depth, but the study stops short of real-world recommendations. In science, as in diet, balance matters.

💬 What do you think? Would you try a heritage diet if the science backed it up? Let’s talk nutrition, evidence, and hype — drop your thoughts below.

I help health orgs and researchers communicate insights clearly — reach out if you want to collaborate!